Smushy Pairing Names – a DIY guide
Jun. 8th, 2008 09:29 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So: you want to write fanfic. And you’re worried that your summary will have too much punctuation. Have no fear! With this quick lesson, you can forget about all the /s, &s, and +s running rampant through your summaries, and instead learn how to craft the perfect smushy name that, with one word, can summarise each relationship in your story.
(For the purposes of this essay, I am using Buffyverse characters. But this technique can easily be used for any fandom, whether it be Harry Potter, Doctor Who, or Sesame Street.)
Step One: identify the most identifiable prefix or suffix among your characters. In our case, this is Spike.
Notice the “Sp”. It’s a prefix that can fit onto almost any word, and it’s instantly identifiable as belonging to Spike.
This is our starting point. From now on, every character in a relationship with Spike will have to take the suffix, because the prefix goes to Spike by default.
There is only one exception to this rule, which I shall mention later.
Step Two: having established the default prefix, we need to find the default suffix. To do this, we find the least identifiable prefix among the characters.
This would be Anya.
“An”, of course, could easily refer to Angel, or to Andrew. When referring to Anya, the “ya” is the most important part.
Of course, the letters needed for the prefix or suffix are not the only letters needed for the pairing name. If they were, then the Spike/Anya relationship would be “Spya”, which is fairly unpronounceable.
In this case, the correct pairing name is “Spinya”, which uses an extra letter from each character.
Note, by the way, that Spinya is made up of the default prefix and suffix, so it’s the perfect pairing name.
Step Three: divide every other character name in half – so that they have a prefix and a suffix.
So Angel becomes “Ang” and “gel”.
Willow is “Wi” and “llow”.
Xander is “X” and “ander”.
Buffy is “B” and “uffy”.
Wesley is “Wes” and “ley”.
and so on…
After each is divided into halves, it’s a simple enough procedure to match a prefix with a suffix, and a suffix with a prefix.
With the default characters (“Sp” and “ya”), it’s easy. Obviously, characters paired with Spike need to use a suffix, and characters paired with Anya need to use a prefix.
So we have Spuffy and Xanya, clearly, and also Spangel, Spimony, Spisilla, Spillow, Willya, and Ganya.
With other character combinations, it’s merely a matter of trying both options, and deciding on the best ones.
Should it be Bander or Xuffy? Cornder or Xandelia? Illyrley or Weslyria? It’s really up to you.
You will find that some choices are easier than others. Killow, for instance, doesn’t sound nearly so workable as Willenedy.
Be wary of names that sound like normal words. They can work, but you’ll still probably want to go with Fresley rather than Wed, Xillow instead of Wander, and Wooth rather than Food. Wiles has interesting connotations, but Gillow might be preferable. And Billow isn’t nearly so good as Wiffy.
You won’t be able to pick all of these by spelling. Non-words can still seem uncomfortably close to real words: like Dangel. It will inevitably remind the reader of “dangle” – you’re much better off going with Angarla.
It gets really interesting when you’re stuck choosing between two normal words. In this case, try for the more exciting word: Concord instead of Cornor.
The occasional normal word can work, though. I think we’re all agreed that Tiles is much better than Gara.
Remember, when you have two characters with the same first initial, the prefix has to be much more specific. Frunn, for instance, has very different implications than Funn. So do Wed and Willed – although, in this case, you’re much better off with Fresley and Frillow.
You’ll find that some characters are much more heavily weighted towards one end of the prefix/suffix scale than the other.
Xander, for instance, almost always ends up using the prefix, as does Buffy (giving us Bangel, Burker, and Butsu – although it should still always be Fuffy rather than Baith).
As I said earlier, there are some exceptions to the default characters. This is because Spuffybot and Olanya just sound ridiculous. Instead, we should go with Botbike and Anlaf – they’re much more sensible.
There is also occasionally a reason to try something completely different. These situations will usually be obvious. After trying Wesginia and Virley without any luck, you’ll suddenly realise that the solution is clearly Wyndham-Bryce, and you’ll wonder why on earth you didn’t think of it sooner…
Let’s take a moment to look at an example from the show.
In AtS, between Offspring and Tomorrow:
Fred points out that Angelia is looking quite likely… that is, until Angarla suddenly pops up again. Because of Angarla’s past excitement, Holtz starts chasing them round Los Angeles, and pretty soon starts training others – leading to the Jultz relationship. Just when Angelia starts getting back on track, Groo returns from Pylea, and Groody picks up where it left off (leaving Angel broody about Groody… but I digress). Meanwhile, there’s a fair bit of competition between Frunn and Fresley. Frunn winning, Wesley delivers Connor into the hands of Jultz, and then goes off for some hot Weslah action. (At one point during the Weslah relationship, by the way, Lilah wears glasses in an attempt to provide some Fresley. This is known as Weslared.)
Eventually, Weslah, Frunn, Groody, and Jultz are all left in tatters, and the whole thing reforms into Fresley, Concord, Gwunn, and Ningel… but that’s another story.
Fanficcers being what they are, we also need to consider the matter of threesomes. It’s actually quite simple: you just pick a smushy name for a couple, and then add the third person in.
So Spuffy becomes Spuffel.
And Bunnedy becomes Bunnewiffedy and then Bunnewiffaithedy.
(Note that Bunnewiffedy is actually a combination of Bunnedy and Wiffy. This sounds much better as a pairing name than the straight Willow-insertion, which would be Bunnewilledy.)
As you can see, this simple technique will make any pairing immediately obvious to the reader. Whether it be canon (Coyle, Tallow, or Joyles), fanon (Larnder or Githan), or really out there (Xara, Dawndrew, Foyle, Cluffy, Benory, or Spinterelle), your summaries will be just that little bit clearer.
And, after all, clarity is what matters.
Step One: identify the most identifiable prefix or suffix among your characters. In our case, this is Spike.
Notice the “Sp”. It’s a prefix that can fit onto almost any word, and it’s instantly identifiable as belonging to Spike.
This is our starting point. From now on, every character in a relationship with Spike will have to take the suffix, because the prefix goes to Spike by default.
There is only one exception to this rule, which I shall mention later.
Step Two: having established the default prefix, we need to find the default suffix. To do this, we find the least identifiable prefix among the characters.
This would be Anya.
“An”, of course, could easily refer to Angel, or to Andrew. When referring to Anya, the “ya” is the most important part.
Of course, the letters needed for the prefix or suffix are not the only letters needed for the pairing name. If they were, then the Spike/Anya relationship would be “Spya”, which is fairly unpronounceable.
In this case, the correct pairing name is “Spinya”, which uses an extra letter from each character.
Note, by the way, that Spinya is made up of the default prefix and suffix, so it’s the perfect pairing name.
Step Three: divide every other character name in half – so that they have a prefix and a suffix.
So Angel becomes “Ang” and “gel”.
Willow is “Wi” and “llow”.
Xander is “X” and “ander”.
Buffy is “B” and “uffy”.
Wesley is “Wes” and “ley”.
and so on…
After each is divided into halves, it’s a simple enough procedure to match a prefix with a suffix, and a suffix with a prefix.
With the default characters (“Sp” and “ya”), it’s easy. Obviously, characters paired with Spike need to use a suffix, and characters paired with Anya need to use a prefix.
So we have Spuffy and Xanya, clearly, and also Spangel, Spimony, Spisilla, Spillow, Willya, and Ganya.
With other character combinations, it’s merely a matter of trying both options, and deciding on the best ones.
Should it be Bander or Xuffy? Cornder or Xandelia? Illyrley or Weslyria? It’s really up to you.
You will find that some choices are easier than others. Killow, for instance, doesn’t sound nearly so workable as Willenedy.
Be wary of names that sound like normal words. They can work, but you’ll still probably want to go with Fresley rather than Wed, Xillow instead of Wander, and Wooth rather than Food. Wiles has interesting connotations, but Gillow might be preferable. And Billow isn’t nearly so good as Wiffy.
You won’t be able to pick all of these by spelling. Non-words can still seem uncomfortably close to real words: like Dangel. It will inevitably remind the reader of “dangle” – you’re much better off going with Angarla.
It gets really interesting when you’re stuck choosing between two normal words. In this case, try for the more exciting word: Concord instead of Cornor.
The occasional normal word can work, though. I think we’re all agreed that Tiles is much better than Gara.
Remember, when you have two characters with the same first initial, the prefix has to be much more specific. Frunn, for instance, has very different implications than Funn. So do Wed and Willed – although, in this case, you’re much better off with Fresley and Frillow.
You’ll find that some characters are much more heavily weighted towards one end of the prefix/suffix scale than the other.
Xander, for instance, almost always ends up using the prefix, as does Buffy (giving us Bangel, Burker, and Butsu – although it should still always be Fuffy rather than Baith).
As I said earlier, there are some exceptions to the default characters. This is because Spuffybot and Olanya just sound ridiculous. Instead, we should go with Botbike and Anlaf – they’re much more sensible.
There is also occasionally a reason to try something completely different. These situations will usually be obvious. After trying Wesginia and Virley without any luck, you’ll suddenly realise that the solution is clearly Wyndham-Bryce, and you’ll wonder why on earth you didn’t think of it sooner…
Let’s take a moment to look at an example from the show.
In AtS, between Offspring and Tomorrow:
Fred points out that Angelia is looking quite likely… that is, until Angarla suddenly pops up again. Because of Angarla’s past excitement, Holtz starts chasing them round Los Angeles, and pretty soon starts training others – leading to the Jultz relationship. Just when Angelia starts getting back on track, Groo returns from Pylea, and Groody picks up where it left off (leaving Angel broody about Groody… but I digress). Meanwhile, there’s a fair bit of competition between Frunn and Fresley. Frunn winning, Wesley delivers Connor into the hands of Jultz, and then goes off for some hot Weslah action. (At one point during the Weslah relationship, by the way, Lilah wears glasses in an attempt to provide some Fresley. This is known as Weslared.)
Eventually, Weslah, Frunn, Groody, and Jultz are all left in tatters, and the whole thing reforms into Fresley, Concord, Gwunn, and Ningel… but that’s another story.
Fanficcers being what they are, we also need to consider the matter of threesomes. It’s actually quite simple: you just pick a smushy name for a couple, and then add the third person in.
So Spuffy becomes Spuffel.
And Bunnedy becomes Bunnewiffedy and then Bunnewiffaithedy.
(Note that Bunnewiffedy is actually a combination of Bunnedy and Wiffy. This sounds much better as a pairing name than the straight Willow-insertion, which would be Bunnewilledy.)
As you can see, this simple technique will make any pairing immediately obvious to the reader. Whether it be canon (Coyle, Tallow, or Joyles), fanon (Larnder or Githan), or really out there (Xara, Dawndrew, Foyle, Cluffy, Benory, or Spinterelle), your summaries will be just that little bit clearer.
And, after all, clarity is what matters.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-07 11:53 pm (UTC)Three points:
1) It's not Anlaf. It's Aulaf. Aud/Olaf=OTP. Unless of course you're talking about modern-day Anya/Troll!Olaf, in which case it's Trolya.
2) There's always a problem when you get to smushing pairing names for lesser-known (or ignored) characters. Case in point: Buffy/Scott Hope is Butt, which is rather unfortunate as nobody ever remembers who Scott is without the surname. But Butthope just sounds wrong, even if it may be in character for Scott given what we found out about him in s7.
3) For extra fun, imagine what happens in crossover fics. Hermillow, Janewiles, Darlash and Xender are all good and well, but just consider for instance the problem of slashing The Master (of Doctor Who) and The Master (of the Buffyerse). For those cases, I think creative mushing should be allowed (not that MaMa is any better, really).
no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 12:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 12:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 12:20 am (UTC)Makes sense. I always figured they both went "Oh, Buffy" at some point that night.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 02:23 am (UTC)Mrrrow! Didn't they!
no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 12:11 am (UTC)2) I'd go with Scoffy, personally.
3) You know, a lot of people forget that both Doctor Who and BtVS have a "Doctor" and a "Master".
Clearly, when the Master's bones are left, it's not because he's a 'special' vampire - he's not a vampire at all. He's a timelord. And as soon as the Scoobies leave for the prom, he'll regenerate.
(Also, I once found a fanfic that had Spike keeping Suvolte eggs safe for The Doctor...)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 12:24 am (UTC)I think I read that one. If it's the same one, I loved it.
But generally, characters who have a title in addition to/instead of a name are tricky. I once paired off Spike with Mr Smithers. He needs the "Mr", but Mr Spithers just sounds unwieldy... and of course, the alternative is Mike.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 12:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 03:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 02:04 am (UTC)Weslared..genius.
It's all very clear..I just have one question:
Who the heck is Spinterelle? -brain melt-
no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 03:23 am (UTC)... well, then the three smushy pairings would be Bord, Drusalton, and Spinterelle.
Clear?
no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 06:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 07:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 11:27 pm (UTC)Ooo, I understand now! It's easy.
Easy as really, really difficult pie.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 02:25 am (UTC)*giggles*
This is why I type out my pairings. :P
no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 03:24 am (UTC)Good plan.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 04:11 am (UTC)My brain started melting at this point, and didn't stop. It got brelty.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 07:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 05:21 am (UTC)What amazes me is the realisation that I have been so blind - all this time I have turned away from certain stories, believing them to be riddled with typos and spelling errors. Now I realise that the authors were merely writing in a shorthand I could not see. *sighs*
*g* Thanks for this, my brain may now hurt, but it's a fun hurt. *goes in search of more coffee*
no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 07:31 am (UTC)Glad you enjoyed this!
no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 06:13 am (UTC)Still, certain pairings like "Funn" are still rather opaque to me. Maybe the characters are too obscure? (Wait--is that "Ford/Gunn"?)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 07:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 08:31 am (UTC)This post has inspired me, however, and I'm going to do a pairing that totally breaks your rules and uses only the 'Sp' prefix from Spike but uses the whole name of the other character. I just can't resist the thought of 'Spampata'.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-08 10:22 pm (UTC)...and I now really want to read the story about Buffybot falling in love with the Harley.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-09 11:09 pm (UTC)your interpretation of botbike is wonderful... although wouldn't that be called harleybot?
no subject
Date: 2008-06-09 08:33 am (UTC)That was so funny - and very, very useful.
Has anyone ever actually written Bunnewiffaithedy, do you happen to know?
no subject
Date: 2008-06-09 10:08 pm (UTC)Has anyone ever actually written Bunnewiffaithedy?
Not that I'm aware of. If you happen to find any, let me know!
no subject
Date: 2008-06-09 10:17 pm (UTC)Did a quick search and found this one. Can't say it looks very good, but still.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 02:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 06:06 am (UTC)This illuminating exposition has clarified many things for me (some perhaps unintended) and I look forward to being able to point and laugh when the unitiated write "Spanya" instead of "Spinya", or fail to mush the threesome/moresome names in the prescribed manner.
Perhaps a sub-rule for the pairings with different valid naming options should be that the dominant partner in the relationship gets the prefix? Before anyone starts flaming me for the slurs I have just cast on Spangel, I hasten to point out that I mean this only for cases where the primary rules do not give a clear indication. So Gillow or Wiles might be alternately appropriate, depending on who's holding the whip.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 05:56 pm (UTC)Ah, shucks, really? *blushes*
that I mean this only for cases where the primary rules do not give a clear indication.
Oh, you can do it in those cases, too. Spangel becomes Angelike (which has such lovely similarities to "angelic", don't you think?
I'm glad you enjoyed reading this!
no subject
Date: 2008-07-04 08:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-04 08:55 pm (UTC)Wike, Fike, and Gike - which are kinda odd.
Xike - which is practically unpronounceable.
Dike - which has... unfortunate connotations.
Bike, Tike, and Hike - no. Just no.
I'm glad you found this interesting to read!
no subject
Date: 2008-07-05 09:41 pm (UTC)Killow, for instance, doesn’t sound nearly so workable as Willenedy.
That would depend on how much said person dislikes Kennedy ;p
(which I actually don't)
no subject
Date: 2008-07-06 10:41 pm (UTC)(which I actually don't)
Me neither. She's kinda fun.